Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others
نویسندگان
چکیده
How and why the presence of a person directly affects the perception and action of another person is a phenomenon that has been approached in a limited and piecemeal fashion within psychology. This kind of diffuse strategy has failed to capture the jointness of perception and action within and between people. In contradistinction, the authors offer a perspective that retains both integrally social features (e.g., involves interaction) and yet adequately exploits the current state of knowledge regarding the ecological properties of perception–action, while at the same time drawing on aspects of dynamic systems theory. In this article the authors review the best attempts to examine how one individual affects another’s perceptions and actions in the emergence of a social unit of action. Two important approaches, the individual-level and cognitive dynamics approaches, have yielded insights that derive in significant degree from principles of ecological psychology and/or dynamical systems theory. Prototypic of the individual-level approach is a focus on what can be perceived by coactors with the aim of uncovering how the dispositional qualities (affordances) of another person are informationally specified during social interaction. In contrast, the cognitive dynamics approach simulates dynamical characteristics of cognition and psychological influence with the aim of uncovering how cooperative interaction emerges out of its component parts. The authors argue that these approaches involve, respectively, insufficient mutuality and insufficient embodiment. Consequently, a social synergy perspective is discussed that approaches the problem of socially cooperative interaction at the relational, nonreductive level, using novel methods to examine how social perception and action emerge through self-organizing processes. ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 18(1), 1–38 Copyright © 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
منابع مشابه
Defining and Acting on Global Health: The Case of Japan and the Refugee Crisis
What counts as global health? There has been limited discourse to date on the ways in which country-level contexts may shape positioning in global health agendas. By reviewing Japan’s response to the refugee crisis, we demonstrate a clash between rhetoric and action on global responsibility, and suggest that cultural and historical factors may be related to the ways of perceiving and acting upo...
متن کاملنگران نباشید، خوشحال باشید، هماهنگی تفاوتها
In reference to most people's inability to communicate effectively and correctly which make their life bitter and unpleasant even causes a lapse from duty or renouncing the work. Acknowledgement and sensitivity to different personality, make a big change in way of perceiving, behaving and encountering others. The Hartman's color code is based on the belief that each of us is born with an inna...
متن کاملSocial Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination
The pull to coordinate with other individuals is fundamental, serving as the basis for our social connectedness to others. Discussed is a dynamical and ecological perspective to joint action, an approach that embeds the individual's mind in a body and the body in a niche, a physical and social environment. Research on uninstructed coordination of simple incidental rhythmic movement, along with ...
متن کامل“The study of personnel and customers’ perception of organizational justice”
Observation of justice is one of the most important indexes influencing satisfaction of the personnel of an organization so that perceiving injustice will result in the personnel dissatisfaction thereby leaving negative influence on their performance [38]. This situation also influences the customers’ satisfaction in the service organizations where the personnel have direct and face-to-face con...
متن کاملCritical study of different approaches in jurisprudential criteria of Islamic State laws
One of the most important requirements for the realization of the Islamic state is to base the legal system of the Islamic state on religious principles and criteria. The debate about the religious criterion of the Islamic state law has been going on for a long time, from the constitutional era to the present day, and it has been intertwined with the basic question of the necessity and what is ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006